Share:

Samsung Wants $1B Verdict Overturned, Says Jury Foreman Was Biased Due To His Seagate Lawsuit

Share:

Samsung has filed a new request for a re-trial demanding that $1.05 billion verdict awarded in favor of Apple should be overturned because the jury foreman Velvin Hogan failed to disclose that 20 years ago he was in litigation with Seagate, for whom Samsung is a major investor, Reuters reports.

According to Samsung, Hogan, who eventually became the foreman, disclosed one lawsuit in which he had been involved, but failed to discuss two others, one of which concerned his former employer, the hard drive maker Seagate. Samsung added that Hogan’s failure to disclose the Seagate suit raises issues of bias that Samsung should have been allowed to explore in questioning.

“Samsung has a substantial strategic relationship with Seagate,” the company said in the court filing, “which culminated last year in the publicized sale of a division to Seagate in a deal worth $1.375 billion, making Samsung the single largest direct shareholder of Seagate.”

Hogan did disclose he had worked for Seagate during voir dire. In an interview with Reuters last week, Hogan acknowledged the litigation with Seagate – now twenty years old – and said he had not been asked to list every lawsuit in which he had ever been involved.

A hearing on a range of issues, including the juror allegations, has been set for December.

Share:

  • FragilityG4

    This smells like collusion on Samsungs part …

  • well, id try everything to get out of paying a billion dollars too… doesn’t mean it’s gonna work

  • Kangaroo

    Having a non-technical Jury for a patent dispute situation is a Kangaroo Court to begin with.
    It was decided at the start who was going to lose. From what I read (before Samsung wanting to overturn) was that there was one person who essentially convinced the rest of the non-technical jurors, who had absolutely no clue about what to make of the “evidence”, to just vote guilty for Samsung. The penalty amount was also arbitrary and had absolutely nothing to do with damages towards Apple. It was a joke of a court case that everyone should be ashamed of, given the spotlight it had in the world. I think many countries would look on U.S. justice with respect to patents as a joke.

Deals