Bell Appeals CRTC Ruling Forcing It to Sell Fibre Access to Small ISPs


If you are dreaming of a better world with gigabit connections in Canada and hope it materializes soon, well, you may have to wait a bit more, as Bell is appealing a CRTC ruling that says big telcos must share high-speed networks with competitors, reports CBC News.

The carrier has filed a petition to the Governor in Council and the telecom regulator, claiming that the CRTC’s decision to “favour resale over investment was surprising and it is inconsistent with Canada’s long-standing policy of facilities-based competition.” Bell also said it’s “unfair” because it contradicts the CRTC’s 2008 decision (reaffirmed as recently as 2011) to refuse to implement mandated reseller access for fibre-to-the-home networks – a decision Bell and others have relied on to make long-term capital investment decisions.

To underpin its position, Bell is now threatening to reduce fibre installation, should the CRTC ruling stand. That means more time to wait for lightning-fast Internet connections.

Bell says the CRTC ruling undermines the three retail revenue streams on which its business case for investing in fibre-to-the-home networks is based. Smaller players should invest in their own fibre networks, the carrier says. The solution: Small ISPs should build their own fibre network.

“It is impossible for the CRTC to set a wholesale rate that adequately compensates those who invest in fibre-to-the-home networks for their investments.”

Bill Sandiford, president and CEO of the Canadian Network Operators’ Consortium, doesn’t agree with that. He says it would cost small ISPs much more than Bell to build the same infrastructure. His reason: the benefits Bell-like companies have enjoyed for more than a century.

“This is because for more than a century, these companies enjoyed taxpayer subsidies and protection from competition, as well as other exclusive benefits such as exclusive rights-of-way and building access,” Sandiford wrote in an opinion piece in the Globe and Mail.

From his point of view, Bell’s appeal is “just regulatory gambling,” as all three major telcos agreed to expand their fibre networks after the CRTC ruling was pronounced.

Open Media’s campaigns manager Josh Tabish doesn’t agree with Bell and sees its request for investment from small ISPs as “unnecessary duplication.” If the ruling stands, there is a chance for some competition from smaller ISPs, which will push Internet prices for fibre networks down.

Technology enthusiast, rocker, biker and writer of Follow me on Twitter or contact me via email:

  • Lakh Jhajj

    Bell is turning out to be the greediest company. These big telcos have enjoyed free spectrum and access to exclusive offering for years. And now when the time is to support the change they are ruining their image (well whatever is left of it) by appealing for this kind of ridiculous privileges. Yeah if u wanna have a fair shot. Let the govt give the small startups like wind free spectrum and charge nothing thenIn no time they grow and stand strong as a competitor. We need CRTC to stand strong on their ruiling. It’s about time now that wireless and Internet monopoly to go end.

  • It’s Me

    Empty threat by Bell. Reducing rollout will hurt their ability to compete with Rogers highspeed even if Rogers has to allow resellers. They would be cutting off their nose to spite their face. CRTC should call their bluff.

  • Crosseyedmofo

    especially with bell fibe being available in less provinces than rogers

  • awkpain

    I believe it was Bell who had the most customer service complaints in the past year? Maybe they should invest in customer service while they act like a stick in the mud. The infrastructure has to be put in place anyway. All copper is slowly transitioning to fiber, even for phone lines. Fiber can carry far more than copper.

  • Ashley Mann

    Greed is good boys, that is, if you’re a BCE share holder! Go get ’em Bell and show the CRTC who’s da’ boss! Bell appealing the CRTC is a great decision.

  • Mr Dog

    In this case it is most especially not.

    Bell speeds are as it is well behind rogers in most cases, the only advantage they truly have is Fibe TV. By slowing down expansion of the Fibe network, they are opening them selves up to a lot of risk in the future.