Share:

Consumer Groups to CRTC: Apply Wireless Code to Existing, New Contracts

Share:

Today marks the first day of the CRTC proceeding on the draft wireless code. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre, Consumers’ Association of Canada, and Council of Senior Citizens’ Organizations of British Columbia released their oral comments towards the draft wireless code.

One of the major points they stressed to the CRTC was to have the draft wireless code apply to existing and new contracts, as opposed to just it apply to new contracts after the code is established.

The consumer group trio published their statement and urged “we can heal the sickness that has crept into the wireless market”:

This hearing is about healing. It is about hope. It is about cooperation.

We can heal the sickness that has crept into the wireless market. Consumers are sick of termination penalties designed to keep them locked into long-term contracts. Consumers are tired of locked handsets. Consumers are often in shock after opening a bill where roaming charges or overage fees have been applied.

Talk about strong words to the CRTC about the state of the wireless market in Canada. You can actually watch the proceeding live here on CPAC and watch the carriers answer questions asked by the CRTC.

Screen Shot 2013 02 11 at 2 16 44 PM

Screen Shot 2013 02 11 at 1 52 10 PM

Earlier, TELUS Chief Marketing Officer, David Fuller, tried to explain the concept of device “tabs” to Elizabeth Duncan, the CRTC Commissioner for the Atlantic region and Nunavut.

Fuller explained from their data, customers opted for three year tab balances instead of one or two, to defer any up front payments for cellphones. This offer of tab balances (which decrease by a percentage every time you pay your bill) resulted in a decrease in customer escalations by over 30% (compared to dealing with breaking contracts for early upgrades) as it allowed users to upgrade immediately to the latest smartphones, such as the iPhone.

Even the short, summarized explanation caused Duncan to be confused, as the amount of details involved overwhelmed her. Wireless customers in Canada can probable relate when it comes to the fine details users have to read and agree to should they sign contracts.

Earlier, the Competition Bureau also published their response to the initial draft wireless code and stressed a ban on locked phones and lengthy contracts. You can enter your comments here to the CRTC until February 15th.

[via The Globe and Mail]

Share:

  • crosseyed_mofo

    every time someone says bucket i wanna punch a puppy

  • crosseyed_mofo

    annnnd the stream stopped working

  • hub2

    Hey, if they offered *reasonable* 2-year terms on iPhones I’d jump on that! Reasonable would be a 16 GB iPhone 5 for $199(ish) on 2 year contract, like in the US.

    NOT $160 for 3 years. Many would gladly pay the extra $40 to avoid the extra year with that chain around their necks.

  • Ouch

Deals