Share:

Ottawa: Wireless Policies Will “Stay the Course” to Create Competitive Industry

Share:

Honorable James Moore, the Minister of Industry, released a statement today reaffirming the Federal Government’s decision to “stay the course” in regards to its wireless policies, such as welcoming a foreign carrier as a fourth wireless player.

Screen Shot 2013 07 31 at 10 04 28 PM

Moore notes since 2008, the Government’s decisions have “driven down the average cost of wireless services by nearly 20%,” and goes on to say their view is to continue to protect consumers and increase wireless competition. Below is an excerpt from his statement:

“Our policy has been clear and remains unchanged: greater competition and liberalized investment has meant more choices at lower prices for Canadian families.

Our Government’s telecommunications policy was not created overnight. It is the result of a vigorous consultation that started in 2008 and continues today. All players – industry, consumer groups and everyday Canadians – contributed to this policy.

We are committed to ensuring the best possible outcomes for Canadian consumers. We want all regions of Canada to benefit from competitive market forces, which is why more progress must be made. We will continue to stay the course by ensuring Canadians benefit from a competitive telecommunications industry.”

Bell’s chief legal and regulatory officer, Mirko Bibic, responded to the Minster’s statement via the Globe and Mail:

“We certainly agree that competition is a good thing. We welcome it. But we’re astonished the minister didn’t address the loopholes that give start-up advantages to giant U.S. wireless incumbents. Given the significance of the issue to a critical Canadian industry, to rural wireless deployment, to the wide range of Canadian groups and individuals that have expressed concern, it’s truly perplexing that the government is ignoring the issue,”

Senior vice-president of regulatory affairs at Rogers, Ken Engelhart, said the following:

“How does it really make any sense to say Verizon can buy two blocks of [700 MHz] spectrum and Rogers can only buy one? I just don’t think they’ve ended up in a logical, common sense place and I think Canadians need to hear about that.”

Anthony Lacavera, CEO of Wind Mobile, on the other hand, welcomed Minister Moore’s comments:

“Minister Moore’s confirmation that the government is resolutely committed to long-term, viable wireless competition in Canada is great news for Canadians.”

Despite ongoing ad campaigns to sway public opinion by Rogers, TELUS and Bell, it appears Moore is not backing down from the Government’s plans to bring in a foreign carrier like Verizon to make the industry more competitive. Regardless what Canadians are told by incumbents on how they will be affected, Ottawa remains unfazed.

Thanks Prashanna

Share:

  • Sven

    Good.

  • 1His_Nibs1

    In the eternal words of Nelson Muntz: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_4bLNM0axE

  • Well played, sir.

  • crosseyed_mofo

    between this and getting rid of the penny, i dislike harper a smidgen less

  • ward09

    The Tories are stubborn and won’t back down from this. The big three as zero public support and will lose any legal challenge in court. They are wasting the time they should be using to improve their plans and service.

  • kkritsilas

    Interesting as to how two faced the incumbent CEOs and the chief legal counsel are with regards to competition; the “We certainly agree that competition is a good thing….” line is a load of hooey. Considering that this gentleman was more than likely in the middle of the policies that allowed the carriers to collude, at least in the legal sense. On one side he is makings sure that the collusion stays within the legal boundaries, and on the other, he is saying “competition is a good thing….”. If the incumbents want to compete, then COMPETE. Stop the PR crap, the ads and the public posturing, sit down and start competing. The gov’t is not buying it, and neither is the general public. So shut the hell up, and lower the plan prices, and compete on that level. Not in the papers, not with PR, not in the courts (see Telus), and not in responses that reduce what little credibility you have left. Nobody is buying what you are trying to sell, and nobody believes you want to compete. And by the way, why are you not asking for any one carrier to be allowed to buy only one block per region. Wouldn’t have anything to do with you and Bell Telus colluding to try and buy up all the bandwidth, would it? Especially in regards to the fact that Bell/Telus are really only one network, and should be allowed to only buy one block between the two of them.

    Kostas

  • Stéphane Lachance

    I don’t like much of what they do but I do agree with how the Conservatives are dealing with telecom (including Wireless competition and saying no to Usage Based Billing).

  • KC

    really. The Penny. lol

  • crasucks

    Canada : selling out to other countries one resource at a time.

    We may as well educate our kids on how to beg for money in India as that is where all the jobs will be soon, ugggh.

Deals