TELUS Responds to ‘Fair for Canada’ Critics, Says Campaign a Success


In an interview with the CBC, in response to the news network’s previous story questioning the Big 3 ‘Fair for Canada’ campaign, Josh Blair, executive vice-president of human resources and chief corporate officer for Telus has said overall the marketing has been a success. The following interview was conducted last week, prior to the latest announcement Verizon is no longer interested in Canada.

Below are excerpts of the interview, where Blair says the company is “seeing a lot of success overall” with the multi-million dollar ‘Fair for Canada’ campaign:

CBC NEWS: How do you think the campaign is going?

Blair: When I step back and look at our broader campaign and all the broader vehicles, discussions, dialogues that are occurring, we’re seeing a lot of success overall in terms of the campaign.

If you look at the two polls that have come out on the topic, both of them have said Canadians do want more competition, they would welcome foreign competition into Canada, and that’s Telus’s position also. But they also said interestingly that Canadians believe the spectrum auction should be fair.

If you look at the Nanos poll, 81 per cent of Canadians said the spectrum auction shouldn’t favour foreign or domestic companies. And if you look at the Foreign Research poll, 65 per cent of Canadians said the auction shouldn’t favour foreign or domestic companies. So I think those are both pretty powerful third party assessments of what is the voice of Canadians on this issue.

CBC News: Labelling the campaign Fair for Canada — I think there are some out there that might think this isn’t about Canada and about what’s fair for Canada. This is about what’s in the best interests for the Big 3.

Blair: If you look at the positions we’re putting forward, we’re not putting positions forward that would just help Telus, Bell and Rogers. And I think you could then critique us if that was the case and say, “This is just about the Big 3, this isn’t about Canada.” But the positions we’re putting forward would also help SaskTel, they would help Videotron, they would help Eastlink, they help [MTS], companies like Public Mobile if they aren’t the ones to be gobbled up by Verizon. I think it shows we truly are putting forward a policy that says be fair to Canada and to foreign entities. But one understands why assumptions are formed too.

Telus does admit here the company knows it’s not perfect and needs to improve:

CBC News: Does it surprise you that some people might be reacting negatively because they feel in the past they haven’t be treated well as customers and now you’re asking them for support?

Blair: No. We’re eyes wide open on this at Telus. We explicitly know we’re not perfect. We know we need to get better. We know we have history that goes back decades of not having customers first as our number one mantra in the company. We’ve changed that at Telus over the past four years and we’re working hard on that. But to say that there are individuals out there who have had negative reaction, we fully understand.

The National Post writes hopefully the Big 3 carriers in Canada have learned a lesson from the possible threat of Verizon and start providing better service, instead of “treating customers like something other than hostages”:

Great to hear. If the wireless firms follow up, and begin treating customers like something other than hostages, something might be gained from the summer of wireless discontent. If they return to believing their own propaganda, Canadians may soon be pleading with Verizon to rethink its position.

With Verizon now out of the wireless picture, the stock prices of the Big 3 have rebounded this morning, with Rogers up 7.4%, Telus up 6.9% and Bell up 4.1%.


  • crosseyed_mofo

    oh dear lord

  • gtasscarlo

    I’m more outraged where stuck with no new competition. This is a blow to us Canadians. We are now at the mercy at the big three cartels. How is that fair for Canadians. Plans are $105 promo to get 6GB of data. And no the big three don’t speak for Canadians, unless its asking how we want our bank accounts drained. Another monopoly of cable and internet.

  • hopeless


    so disappointed in all of this

  • 1His_Nibs1

    If Telus believes this campaign was a success, they’re bloody delusional. It’s real shitty things will go back to status quo for the big 3 and they’ll go back to taking us customers for granted again.

  • Chrome262

    Why didn’t they ask if it was fair that the big 3 held almost all of the spectrum now, and that new incumbents, regardless of who they are, will always lose out in an auction that they are not excluded from. Because they will have no bargaining chip to use against the big 3 to get network access for their customers on the 85% of the spectrum they don’t have. People just didn’t understand that for the auction to be fair, you had to exclude the major spectrum holders. In fact letting them have possibly two blocks is too much. CBC sucks at news, programs…everything lol I don’t know why they get our tax dollars.

  • Al

    Somebody ought’a smack that guy upside the head.

  • Westben

    The analogy of a poker game with 9 players at the table, the big stacks are Rogers, Telus and Bell, and we know who the short stacks are. So if spectrum pricing is reduced to the short stacks to help “level the field” good for us. However the big 3 will merely purchase the spectrum to keep any chance of the short stacks of ever becoming “one of them”. The only short sightedness of industry Canada is discounting spectrum to a bidder who doesn’t need a discount “aka Verizon”. I do believe that the big 3 should not be allowed to own more than 50% of the spectrum albeit 700mhz or any other for that matter simply to allow free enterprise a chance to flourish. We see the same problem if the food supply, with Loblaws, Sobeys, Real Canadian buying up the smaller chains and you will see by the late 201x the results of these conglomerates in the price we pay for food.
    I side with Industry Canada on this issue.