The CRTC Rules Against Usage Based Billing for Internet


A significant update has emerged over the debate about usage-based billing. The CRTC announced its ruling yesterday in regards to usage-based billing, and they have ruled against the model Bell wanted to implement. However, the ruling isn’t exactly a clear victory for consumers, writes Michael Geist:

On the specific decision, the CRTC rejected the UBB model it approved less than a year ago, acknowledging that it was too inflexible and could block independent ISPs from differentiating their services.  The issue then boiled down to Bell’s preferred model based on volume and the independent ISPs’ approach who preferred capacity based models. The Commission ruled that capacity-based models are a better approach since they are more consistent with how network providers plan their networks and less susceptible to billing disputes.

With Bell’s preferred approach out of the way, the Commission was left to choose between two capacity models – the independent providers’ “95th percentile” solution and MTS Allstream’s capacity model. The Commission chose a variant on the MTS Allstream model that involves both a monthly access fee and a monthly capacity charge that can increase in increments of 100 Mbps. That model is even more flexible than what MTS proposed, suggesting that the Commission was primarily focused on building in as much flexibility for independent providers as possible. In addition to this model (which the Commission calls an approved capacity model), the large ISPs can continue to use flat rate models which provide for unlimited usage. sees this ruling as a victory for consumers, as over 500,000 Canadians signed a petition against UBB:

This is what we’ve been waiting for. Together we’ve stopped Big Telecom’s plan to impose usage-based billing (Internet metering) on all Canadians. Big phone and cable companies tried to rig the market but they were caught red-handed.

A year ago the CRTC decided that big telecom giants could force their small competitors to adopt metered billing. This would have killed Big Telecom’s independent competitors, and it would have meant a more expensive and controlled Internet for all Canadians. It was this outrageous move that led to launch the now half-a-million strong Stop The Meter petition that forced the CRTC to reconsider their plan.

Yesterday, finally, the CRTC pulled back from its mandatory metered billing decision. This decision won’t stop all big telecom metering, but it could provide a much needed unlimited, independent option for many Canadians. It is truly rare for people to outmaneuver Big Telecom lobbyists, but together, we did it. Thank you for playing a crucial part in safeguarding the affordable Internet.

What a fantastic win for consumers, as we were able actually force a change. Now, if only we can replicate this effort towards lowering cellphone rates in Canada, eh?


  • Wuju

    Horray! Yes, what about billing rate reduction or more option of data plan billing. Either it’s $30 for 6G or the other option is like 500 Meg for $20 bucks or something – ridiculous. I would like to see a 1 to 2 Gig plan (plenty for 90% of users requirement I imagine) that cost like 15 bucks – more people would sign up for it. Price it right and alot more people will sign up. Think about Apple 99 cents per music model, where it gets more downloads per user than say another higher price models out there long ago.

  • Anonymous

    This is not a win, more of a deflection than anything. The per mbps type billing is a good way to go, the pricing is way out of whack. Bell is charging a base fee per user ranging about 10-25 bucks depending on the tier as well as $2200 per 100mbps of interconnect between Bell and the third party provider. This is absurd pricing for something that truly costs much less. In any case, Teksavvy, Distributel, Acanac etc will all have to raise their prices and/or impose some sort of cap on their customers. 

    Basically instead of paying for the Gigabytes you will be paying for the maximum gigabits per second capacity. It’ll be interesting to see how teksavvy and the other companies price things out.

  • Someone

    It’s not just bell it also Rogers. They both are same

  • Anonymous

    I don’t like the ruling because they need to evaluate the pricing structure that the big guys are going to start charging the small guys.

    No caps is good. Throttling my connection at high peak times is not good. The upcoming price hike is not good either.

    Time to start downloading the Internet

  • Anon

    Robbers, Hell, and Hellus are still charging insane rates compared to the US.  Horray!  They are still making a killing.

  • Pingback: Launches ‘Stop the Squeeze’ Campaign Against Our ‘Big 3′ Carriers | iPhone in Canada Blog - Canada's #1 iPhone Resource()