Share:

Range Test: AirPods vs Beats Solo3 vs Non-W1 Beats Headphones

Share:

Distance

The folks over at iDownloadBlog have conduct a little test to compare the operating range of AirPods, Beats Solo3 and two wireless non-W1 Beats headphones, to see if Apple’s W1 chip actually has an effect on the operating range. The headphones were paired with an iPad one after another, and then a bee-line was made for the opposite direction in order to obtain the maximum operating distance attainable for each.

“I set out to determine two things: the maximum optimal range of the headphones (music plays steadily, no dropouts) first, followed by the absolute maximum range (tolerating interference and dropouts) second. Afterwards, the W1 chip headphones will be put through their paces. At this point I’m still taking bets as to who will go the farthest.”

To assure repeatability of the outcome as much as I can, the following measures were taken:

  • All devices and headphones were fully charged.
  • Repeated the walks twice to double-check.
  • Walked slowly, one step at a time and halted to ensure headphones could bounce back whenever they lost connection.

The Beats Solo3 headphones won the contest by a significant margin, with maximum operating range of 328ft., followed by the AirPods (180ft.), Beats Studio Wireless (147ft.) and PowerBeats2 (110 ft.).

For more details about the testing process, head over to the source page.

Share:

  • Mario Gaucher

    180ft for the AirPods is not bad…

  • Sumit Sekhri

    Would be curious to see the range for W1 enabled Powerbeats.

  • Dominic

    37m of optimal range ? I guess 200 + $ is not an awful price then

  • bspence88

    I can have my phone charging upstairs in my house and answer calls with my AirPods downstairs in the opposite corner of the house with no interference. That’s pretty damn good to me.

Deals