Cell Phones Leak Hazardous Electromagnetic Radiation, Warns CDPH

According to a warning issued this week by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) against cellphone radiation, these devices are leaking hazardous electromagnetic radiation, because of which people must decrease the use of cell phones and also keep their distance when possible, TechCrunch is reporting.

Radiation

Last year, UC Berkeley professor Joel Moskowitz initiated a lawsuit to release the findings from a 2009 department document, after he started looking into whether mobile phone use increased the risk of tumors.

This new warning from CDPH comes after those findings were finally published this week after an order from the Sacramento Superior Court. A draft of the document was released back in March as well, although the final release is much more extensive.

“The cellphone manufacturers want you to keep a minimum distance away from your body and you should find out what that distance is,” Moskowitz told local news station KCRA, shortly after the draft release. “If you keep the device by your body you will exceed the safety limits provided by the FCC.”

The CDHP recommends not keeping your phone in your pocket, not putting it up to your ear for a prolonged amount of time, keeping use low if there are two bars or less, not sleeping near it at night and to be aware that if you are in a fast-moving car, bus or train, your phone will emit more RF energy to maintain the connection.

According to the FCC however, there is currently no national standard developed for safety limits, even though the agency requires cell phone manufacturers to ensure all phones comply with “objective limits for safe exposure”.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Surveillance
Surveillance
8 years ago

Am I going to die?

My 1/2 cents
My 1/2 cents
Reply to  Surveillance
8 years ago

Like all of us, yes. Many sooner than later though.

Aleks Oniszczak
Aleks Oniszczak
8 years ago

And don’t forget to close your eyes when using faceID.

My 1/2 cents
My 1/2 cents
Reply to  Aleks Oniszczak
8 years ago

And eat at McDonalds 5x a week…nothing bad will happen.

sukisszoze
sukisszoze
Reply to  Aleks Oniszczak
8 years ago

HAHA..good one.

Riddlemethis
Riddlemethis
Reply to  Aleks Oniszczak
8 years ago

I don’t have faceid.

Aleks Oniszczak
Aleks Oniszczak
Reply to  Riddlemethis
8 years ago

Second hand faceID is equally harmful. Don’t hang out with friends who use iPhone Xs in public.

Hosaka
Hosaka
8 years ago

“According to a warning issued this week by…”

Oooooo…sounds serious!

“…the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) against cellphone radiation…”

*eyes roll*

The state where everything has a sign or label warning you that it causes cancer, birth defects, or mutation.

fatiredflyer
fatiredflyer
8 years ago

Cancers are an epidemic increasing exponentially, as is RF saturation.
It would be helpful if we knew the numbers from the manufacturers…

Valdimir Sputnik
Valdimir Sputnik
8 years ago

California produces some of the nuttiest crap around.
I would wait for more reputable EVIDENCE.

Re
Re
8 years ago

EVIDENCE exists and has for decades. Research it for yourself. People injure not only themselves but also others within range. You might want to look up interviews with a microwave weapons expert, or read the bio initiative report, or the scientists appeal to the UN, or biological effects of selected nonlethal weapons, or biological effects of electromagnetic radiation radiowaves and microwaves Eurasian communist countries, or Naval Medical Research Institute (1972) Report No. AD750271 for starters. That’s all about equivalent to an ice crystal on the tip of the iceberg of evidence of the harmful effects. Avoid it as much as possible. Get a meter and measure the environment.

Idaho astro
Idaho astro
8 years ago

Read CDPH’s own press release on this. Every one of the links they provide for further info states that there is no scientific evidence that radio frequency radiation causes negative health effects. This is pure hysteria.

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x