With Facebook looking to offer an ad-free subscription option to its users, a comprehensive analysis published by TechCrunch suggests that the social media giant might have to charge its users around $11 to $14 per month for an ad-free tier. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has however maintained that Facebook will remain free to everyone, including those who can’t afford a monthly fee.
According to the analysis, the monthly subscription price would need to offset Facebook’s ad earnings, which in the US & Canada alone amounted to $19.9 billion in 2017 from 239 million users. While this means an average user there would have to pay $7 per month, TechCrunch says that for Facebook to offset the ad revenue of its rich “hardcore” users, it might have to charge much more than that.
Those willing and able to pay are probably richer than the average user, so luxury businesses pay more to advertise to them, and probably spend more time browsing Facebook than the average user, so they see more of those ads.
Brace for sticker shock, because for Facebook to offset the ad revenue of these rich hardcore users, it might have to charge more like $11 to $14 per month. With no bonus features, that price for something they can get for free could seem way too high. Many who could afford it still wouldn’t justify it, regardless of how much time they spend on Facebook compared to other media subscriptions they shell out for.
While it might not matter to Facebook the percentage of users it eventually gets to pay, it would certainly be worth it for the company to build out a subscription option that provides a perspective to its users on the value of what they get for free.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
Or just use an adblocker for FREE!!
Which would mean your data and your online activity patterns are still being sold. You just wouldn’t see the resultant ads.
Ostensibly, this subscription model would reduce how much your privacy is being eroded. Realistically, it just means you’d be paying and being exploited at the same time.
I said it before. I’ll say it again. Privacy is overrated. If you aren’t doing anything wrong what’s the worry?
I guess I’m just used to a different crowded culture where everyone knows everything about everyone. you aren’t paying for it so they have to get something from you in return.
You don’t like it, don’t use it. Pretty simple