Quebec’s Streaming Bill Could Kill Your Netflix Library

Quebec recently introduced a new bill to regulate streaming platforms like Netflix and Spotify—but critics say it’s both legally shaky and likely to reduce what Quebecers can actually watch or listen to.

Bill 109, introduced by Quebec’s Culture and Communications Minister Matthew Lacombe, aims to boost visibility of French-language content online. But it goes much further than that. The bill proposes mandatory quotas for French-language content on streaming platforms and would give the province power to influence how content is displayed to users.

University of Ottawa law professor Dr. Michael Geist says the bill is almost certain to face a constitutional challenge. Under Canada’s Constitution, broadcasting is a federal responsibility, and courts have repeatedly affirmed that the provinces can’t regulate it. The question is whether streaming counts as broadcasting—something federal regulators are still figuring out.

If streaming is considered broadcasting, Quebec likely can’t impose its own rules. If it’s not, then even Ottawa’s own Online Streaming Act could be at risk.

Beyond the legal fight, critics say Bill 109 may do more harm than good. Streaming services already make French content accessible—Netflix, for example, offers language-based browsing, and Amazon lets users set language preferences.

But the real concern is the quota system. If the government mandates that, say, 30% of content be in French, services might simply cut English or other content to meet that threshold, leaving Quebecers with fewer options overall. In some cases, platforms may even consider pulling out of Quebec entirely rather than deal with the added regulatory cost. Are you prepared to see your favourite streaming service in Quebec end up with a gutted library?

Non-video platforms like Spotify and podcast apps could also be hit, with unclear rules on how to ensure a percentage of French-language content—especially when content is user-generated.

To avoid the fallout, the bill allows for private settlements between platforms and the province. But that approach is drawing comparisons to Canada’s failed Online News Act, which led Meta to block news links on Facebook and Instagram.

While Ottawa’s streaming law has its critics, Dr. Geist argues that Quebec’s attempt to go it alone with Bill 109 is even more problematic—legally, practically, and for consumers.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
clee666
clee666
11 months ago

I don't have Netflix so I can't comment, but I agree with the Bill. I have Spotify and it's not doing anything to promote new local artists. I have a very hard time discovering new Québec artists on that platform. AppleTV is doing a little bit better, there is a section promoting local content.

pg_72
pg_72
Reply to  clee666
11 months ago

These are international services/providers, I think the fact that any province would try to regulate them is ludicrous and highly egotistical. I live in Nova Scotia, and am from Newfoundland, and I can't easily find new local artists for either of those provinces, but I damn sure don't expect the provinces to start trying to regulate them. Hell, "Sullivan's Crossing" is both based in storyline wise and filmed in Nova Scotia, and is on Crave, but Crave doesn't do anything extra special to promote it anymore than they do HBO or Hulu content like "The Last of Us" and "The Handmaid's Tale"

Le Tuxedo
Le Tuxedo
Reply to  pg_72
11 months ago

Nova Scotia and Newfoundland doesn’t speak French. So can’t compare.
By the way New Brunswick is a bilingual province not Quebec also can’t compare

pg_72
pg_72
Reply to  Le Tuxedo
11 months ago

Both NS and NL, particularly NL, have their own histories and cultures, particularly NL. My point is that neither of the provinces seek any preferential treatment. Quebec does. Repeatedly.

Trust me, I'm glad my province can't be compared to Quebec. Take that however you wish.

marorun1982
marorun1982
Reply to  clee666
11 months ago

Forcing them to promote local artist or content I am fine with that. Forcing 30% minimums local content is ridiculous as those platforms are world wide one and Quebec do not produce 30% of world wide content.

Gordon Wilson
Gordon Wilson
Reply to  clee666
11 months ago

Quebec movies and music suck, there are s few good srtists zmd they mostly sing in Anglais lol.
Charlotte Cardin, Celine .
Like csn we just decide what we want in our own homes without idiotic laws. Like the Home Depot Canadian Tire, second cup cofee will be what now . Its no danger to french. Its like living in East Germany with these dumb laws. lol

clee666
clee666
Reply to  Gordon Wilson
11 months ago

I prefer Québec movies or movies from any other culture than the American remakes.

Jason H
Jason H
11 months ago

Only Quebec would be this Moronic to try and regulate content that doesn't even originate there. Quebec wonders why the rest of Canada has a chuckle at their expense – here's why. Incredibly out of touch. No other province would be allowed to do this much less get away with it. I don't see New Brunswick pulling this nonsense.

pg_72
pg_72
Reply to  Jason H
11 months ago

I tried to be a little more diplomatic in my comment, but I totally agree with you.

JF
JF
Reply to  Jason H
11 months ago

Il vient d'où ce mythe que les Québécois se demandent pourquoi le roc ne les aiment pas ? Est-ce que les Canadiens croient vraiment que les Québécois s'intéressent a ce qu'ils peuvent penser d'eux ?

Helwani Nose
Helwani Nose
Reply to  JF
11 months ago

Une société de Karen qui pensent que leur opinion est la plus importante.🙄

Helwani Nose
Helwani Nose
Reply to  Jason H
11 months ago

I presume you're not aware enough to think they give a cr@p what you and others in provinces they'll never visit think. The world is full of Karens who think they matter.

elephantine
elephantine
Reply to  Jason H
11 months ago

I'm so fed up with this stuff. It's so ridiculous and such a waste of our money for politicians to waste time creating problems instead of dealing with actual important issues.

Michel Renaud
Michel Renaud
11 months ago

I'm not interested in the garbage the CAQ wants the services to put forward. I'm seriously worried about my personal choices being at least partly wiped out with this nonsense.

Stephen Gillis
Stephen Gillis
Reply to  Michel Renaud
11 months ago

The CAQ, along with the PQ, the QS and heck even the Liberals…do not want you to have any choice when it comes to language.

marorun1982
marorun1982
Reply to  Stephen Gillis
11 months ago

Now in day to day life they can do it. Try going to live in Japan and never speak the local language. Still its ridiculous to try to control what ppl can purchase or watch on the internet as that is a world wide thing.

elephantine
elephantine
Reply to  Stephen Gillis
11 months ago

Would all of them do the same ridiculous stuff the CAQ does? I thought this was a CAQ obsession. Maybe PQ. But QS too? Ugh

einsteinbqat
einsteinbqat
11 months ago

Chill out, people! France does exactly the same thing. And the QC law asks for francophone content, which can come from all of the Francophonie, not just QC content. And in any case, if you don’t watch francophone content, the algorithm is unlikely to show you much francophone content.

Stephen Gillis
Stephen Gillis
Reply to  einsteinbqat
11 months ago

The law is meant to force french first, as a default. If I wanted french content..or German (Dark) or Korean (Squid Games) or Spanish I am perfectly capable of searching it on my own. I don't need Grand Frère holding the remote.
I would thank the Quebec government to stay out of my living room.

einsteinbqat
einsteinbqat
Reply to  Stephen Gillis
11 months ago

No it does not. The law does not even impose a quota. It is that way so that Quebec can negotiate with streamers without having to embed everything in the law and having to go through the National Assembly again if the government want to change or modify things after the fact.

Also, it’s not to put francophone films, series, etc., front and centre. It’s to make it easier for users to find and discover francophone contents.

The minister clearly said that the content that you consume is up to you. The choice is yours. The bill wants to make sure that streamers put forward and suggest francophone content like they propose Spanish, Korean, Scandinavian, German content. Giving it a fighting chance.

I don’t watch a lot of francophone content on Netflix or others, but I won’t be butt hurt because Netflix start proposing me some more such content. If I don’t want to watch it, ill just skip it. Just like the bunch of foreign content that it throws at me that I ignore.

I am not screaming because it shows me a lot of Spanish, Japanese or Scandinavian content because I watched a few films or series coming from those regions. The algorithm will just change and adapt as I ignore the things I don’t want to watch.

I don’t think that it will change drastically what is proposed to you.

Stephen Gillis
Stephen Gillis
Reply to  einsteinbqat
11 months ago

I don’t think you read the article. It’s right on the top of the article

“The bill proposes mandatory quotas for French-language content on streaming platforms and would give the province power to influence how content is displayed to users”

einsteinbqat
einsteinbqat
Reply to  Stephen Gillis
11 months ago

This article is incomplete.

The bill does not impose any specific quota. The bill, if it becomes law, will allow the gouvernement to decide — after the royal assent — what it thinks the percentage should be. This is a regulation, not a law. This means that streamers could influence / negotiate the final quota. It is not written into law. This allows flexibility.

Also, the law will also allow a regulation of substitution agreements. What this means is that streamers whose business model makes it difficult to comply with the law to enter into an agreement be negotiating with the minister to implement substitution measures such as an investment in the production of local content instead, for example.

Stephen Gillis
Stephen Gillis
Reply to  einsteinbqat
11 months ago

Ok just to be clear…you went from there is no quota, to they can negotiate the quota…so there is going to be a quota. You can parse if however you like…but the bill is designed to have a mandated minimum number of offerings, whether by “negotiations” or imposition. So…a quota.

einsteinbqat
einsteinbqat
Reply to  Stephen Gillis
11 months ago

It is a HUGE difference. The article said it is the bill that is imposing. I said that the bill is not. And I still stand by what I wrote. There is a nuance. And a nuance in regards to bill, laws, regulation, any legislation is a big difference. Being able to negotiate or influence the final number is important.

You may say that it’s the same, but I don’t see it that way. If the bill imposed a quota, when it becomes law, there is no way to change it, whether to increase or reduce the quota. It would require a new law. This difference is of importance. So, the bill does not impose or require a quota.

Stephen Gillis
Stephen Gillis
11 months ago

If not for the politicians, Quebec would be a very nice place. It's the politicians and their endless manufacturing of crises to amp their base that makes things intolerable.

marorun1982
marorun1982
11 months ago

I think next election that moronic party will get removed in Quebec.

Ron Chasr
Ron Chasr
11 months ago

Im tired of the legault government destroying the english com unity here in quebec. The world isnt going to bow down to this stupid province and quebec will be turned i nto a 3rd world country with less and less availableproducts.

Sandy Pyke
Sandy Pyke
11 months ago

I am in Quebec and my Spotify playlists include Quebec artists. Platforms like Spotify will simply block Quebecers, so the Quebec artists the government is trying to protect will loose access to their audience on those platforms. Bravo Quebec, je vais me souvenir…

Dave McAndrew
Dave McAndrew
11 months ago

One step closer to China. I won't be around to see it and my golden years won't be spent here. It's beyond ridiculous, that useless fight to stop the sun from shining. English is a language, not a crime.

Christopher Baldrey
Christopher Baldrey
6 months ago

I because I choose to but I want my dictionary and my system language to be automatically default to Canadian English because I am located inside of Canada. However, technology companies don't seem to think that Canada exists so I can understand the Quebec legislature. Wanting to have Quebec first French first and I don't think it's all that difficult to do it for Netflix and YouTube and everybody else. It's all about choice and doing the right thing by using the Geo location on where it's being used. It's the best option

30
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x