iPhone 6s Plus vs Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Speedtest [VIDEO]

YouTube channel PhoneBuff is back with another speedtest, this time pitting the iPhone 6s Plus versus the Galaxy Note 5. Each device goes through an unscientific timed test, opening a series of apps and reopening them. The first device to finish the series of actions first in the shortest time wins the test.

Screenshot 2015 10 03 11 04 45
Check out the video below:

If you take a look at the test above, even snapping a Live Photo on the iPhone 6s Plus than a regular image being taken on the Galaxy Note 5. Blame Samsung’s ‘bloated’ TouchWiz for the slowdowns.

Early iPhone 6s benchmarks shared by AnandTech revealed the smartphone’s NAND controller combines PCI-E and NVMe, the first mobile solution to use both, which sets new mobile benchmarks according to the site’s preliminary tests.

Founder and Editor-in-Chief of iPhoneinCanada.ca. Follow me on Twitter, and @iPhoneinCanada, and on Google+.

  • aaloo

    But but but, it’s octa core 🙂

  • Paul

    Donest mean anything my note 5 runs rings around my friends iPhone 6s plus. In normal everyday use note 5 destroyed it. Put them side by side and see how fast Google maps loads and finds your location, open the camera and take a photo, load Web pages. No one opens applications and uses there phone like that test!

  • Nuser


  • Shane

    Ha! Denial…

  • How many 6S Plus friends do you have already? The phone just came out. Somehow I doubt your claims.

  • Paul

    Mate I’m a tech happy nut and my friends too. Some love there iPhone others Samsung or different phones. Yes the phone just come out so that means it out my friend besides I had my note 5 weeks before due release in Australia. So for your information my best mates wife has a rose gold 6s plus and he has a note 5 aswell. Doubt all you like I’ve got nothing against apple. The IOS and the iPhone are a great ecosystem software and hardware combined 🙂

  • Paul

    Get both the phones and see for yourself haha!

  • Nuser

    Ok. Good your phone is faster.