Share:

Rogers to End Financial Support for Viceland TV Channel

Share:

Channel

While it remains unclear what the decision means for the broader partnership between the two, Rogers Media has informed its partner Vice Media Canada that it will no longer financially support the Viceland television channel, The Globe and Mail is reporting. Leaving the station’s future in Canada uncertain, Rogers will cut off its funding early next year, according to multiple sources familiar of the matter.

Rogers CEO Guy Laurence and Vice co-founder Shane Smith announced the $100-million, three-year partnership in October, 2014. The exact terms of the deal have never been public. At the time, Mr. Laurence said in an interview, “So it’s a $100-million investment over the first three years. It doesn’t mean it’s a three-year deal and it stops by the way.”

Rogers owns 70 per cent of Viceland Canada while Vice owns the remaining 30 per cent, according to filings with the broadcast regulator. The station posted a loss of $2.49-million for the 12 months ended Aug. 31, 2016, based on the most recent CRTC data available.

Citing a person with direct knowledge of the decision, the publication claims that Viceland Canada’s ratings are low and that it is losing money, which is why Rogers has given Vice an advance notice that it will no longer support the venture. Meanwhile, Rogers Media spokeswoman Andrea Goldstein has said that the company does not comment “on rumours and speculation”, whereas Vice Media spokesman has also declined to comment.

Last year in June, Rogers said it was adding six new shows to the Canadian channel, including the network’s first scripted series, Nirvanna The Band The Show. The channel brought in $787,000 in advertising revenue that year, although subscriber fees saw a 19% decline.

Share:

  • Bill___A

    I wish we had the ability to choose which channels we “funded” in our cable bills, instead of being forced into “packages”. Each and every channel that wants money from the cable company (and therefore the subscriber) should be optional. Check all of the boxes beside all of the channels you want, and packages are formed based upon what the subscriber wants.

    To be clear, ANY channel that wants to be mandatory on the “basic” package should get absolutely no money from the cable subscriber.

    We’ve had this model for years where we are forced to pay for channels we don’t want if that channel is able to force the CRTC to make it a “basic channel”. I’m not saying this one is but let’s get rid of the channels that we don’t want.

    As to Rogers – they should not have to throw their money down a hole. If this channel doesn’t cut it, bye bye.

Deals