Rogers and Shaw announced on late Friday night PDT it was notified this afternoon by the Commissioner of Competition after trading close, that it plans to oppose the merger of both companies, and will file applications to the Competition Tribunal stating the fact.
In a statement, Rogers and Shaw said they remain committed to the merger, noting it is “in the best interests of Canada and Canadians because of the significant long-term benefits it will bring for consumers, businesses and the economy.”
Roger and Shaw say they are “engaged” in a process to sell Freedom Mobile and its 2 million wireless users, in an effort to fully divest Shaw’s wireless business, as it believes this will address concerns of the Competition Bureau and ISED.
Both companies say they plan to oppose the Commissioner of Competition’s application while working with the Competition Bureau in an attempt to resolve the matter and pursue the merger.
To allow for continued engagement with the Competition Bureau, the outside date of the merger has been extended to July 31, 2022, according to Rogers, Shaw and the Shaw Family Living Trust. Both Rogers and Shaw say it still seeks approval from the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development.
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) previously approved Rogers’ acquisition of Shaw’s broadcasting services, subject to conditions, while Shaw shareholders and the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta have also approved the merger.
Rogers and Shaw reiterated the deal would “foster greater competition” in Canada, while offering more choice for consumers and businesses. Non-profit consumer advocacy groups, however, feel the opposite will happen if the $26 billion merger goes through.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
How on earth would one less company and fewer jobs “foster greater competition”
Shaw and Rogers are delusional, and so is anyone who believes their lies.
I’m not disagreeing with you, but their rationale for the increased competition is that Freedom/Shaw Mobile being sold off would create a fourth nationwide carrier in the cellphone space.
If the guy who started Wind Mobile can buy it, I might believe it. If Xplorenet (Rogers’ choice) buys it, no chance.
Your claim is preposterous. Rogers said the deal would foster greater competition “before” they were told to sell Freedom, not “after”.
They could have still been talking about fixed not wireless service when they said that.
Rogers would be able to offer services that Shaw never could at a Canada-wide level that we don’t currently have.. at the internet and TV level.
But this is the problem, it’s all mixed together.
The Egyptian guy who neglected standards to better the bottom line?
No, Anthony Lacevera.
It Shaw sells its service to someone that’s only maintains status quo, it doesn’t increase anything.
It Shaw sells its service to someone that’s only maintains status quo, it doesn’t increase anything.