TTC Subway Needs Cell Coverage from Rogers, Bell, and Telus: Experts

Torontonians and experts are once again calling for Rogers, Bell, and Telus to provide underground cellular service on the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) subway amid an uptick in violent incidents, including stabbings, armed robberies, and assaults, on the line in recent months — reports CityNews Toronto.

In 2012, BAI Communications won a 20-year, $25 million exclusive contract to build out network infrastructure on the TTC. Today, the infrastructure required for talk, text, and data coverage is in place across all 75 subway stations and portions of the tunnel, but underground cellular coverage remains widely unavailable.

Right now, Shaw Communications-owned Freedom Mobile is the only operator to agree to BAI’s licensing terms and provide underground cell service in Toronto. None of the Big Three have signed on to provide coverage along the TTC.

Brett Caraway, a professor of Communication, Culture, Information and Technology at the University of Toronto, said he believes the three major Canadian telecom operators want to install their own infrastructure instead of paying to use someone else’s.

“They’re not necessarily fond of making a network-sharing arrangement,” the professor said. “I think the position of TTC, the City of Toronto and maybe BAI is there’s no reason to have duplication of infrastructure inside the subway system.”

In a statement to CityNews, BAI said that it wants to work with all carriers. “We are eager to work with all carriers to provide cellular access to all TTC riders. We appreciate that Freedom Mobile has been our engaged and collaborative partner for several years.”

Bell Canada told CityNews that it wants to build its own 5G network in the subway. However, the agreement with BAI is exclusive, preventing other companies from building their own network infrastructure in the subway.

“What we’re seeing here is a case where public safety is secondary to the big cell networks maintaining their oligopoly because they don’t want to be paying licensing fees to someone else that got there first,” said Daniel Tsai, a law professor at Toronto Metropolitan University.

There simply isn’t enough incentive or competition for Rogers, Bell, and Telus to work together and sign on with BAI, Tsai noted.

“If you allowed all three of the major companies to lay [it down], then you are not only tripling the number of materials in the subway system, but you’re tripling the number of people that would have to go down and do maintenance,” he said.

Users on all networks can currently access 9-1-1 services on the TTC. However, Matti Siemiatycki, Director of the Infrastructure Institute at the University of Toronto, argued that subway riders need cell service for more than just emergency calls: to get in touch with their loved ones, to have work or everyday conversations, or even pass the time during rides, among other things.

“You want to be texting a friend or texting a spouse to let them know where you are … Cell phone service is about connection for all sorts of reasons,” he said.

“It’s a connection to feeling safe; it’s a connection to continue a conversation; it’s a connection for business reasons or recreation and [to] pass the time in spaces in between.”

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bill Jackson
3 years ago

BAI is an insider racket that has been allowed to exist on the TTC

G____
G____
3 years ago

The TTC should not have signed an exclusive agreement with a foreign company. Just like Vancouver should not have underground mobile just from Rogers. I would like to see what BAI agreed to give the TTC in exchange for this contract and how much they are wanting to charge for access. Yes, I agree that all public infrastructure – airports, train stations, subways etc, should be available to all Canadian carriers at a reasonable cost. There should be no exclusive contracts. Is someone supposed to sign up for Freedom to use the system in Toronto, with Rogers to use the one in Vancouver etc? BAI should have been required to sign agreements with all of the carriers before being awarded the contract, then we wouldn’t be in this pickle. And transit/airport authorities need to not view cell service as a profit center if it is a safety issue.

MleB1
MleB1
Reply to  G____
3 years ago

Well, we don’t know the terms BAI insist upon, but I think if Freedom (a barely-there wireless provider) can manage them, then the Big 3 could bite the bullet and accept them, too. Spend some of their enormous profit they gouge from subscribers on providing a service. Ditto for the Vancouver service.

As noted elsewhere on this thread, their demand that they get to each install their own equipment (when the service already exists) speaks more to their greed (and being petty) than practical needs.

TTC and Vancouver Transit have made a service available to riders. Who installed it in immaterial – and BAI has experience doing that elsewhere. Why chance three separate companies with no history with it and risk safety issues with additional maintenance staff demanding access to look after each service?

G____
G____
Reply to  MleB1
3 years ago

I’m sure BAI is banking on the fact that people will pressure the carriers to sign up with them. Then every airport, subway and public venue will be this way. All of the carriers should have been brought on board before this “exclusive” contract was awarded.

Emil
Emil
3 years ago

I’m pretty sure BAI is too greedy, wants too much for access hence the resistance of the carriers to hop on board.

Stu Moir
Stu Moir
Reply to  Emil
3 years ago

I’d lay down cash on it being the other way around.

Stu Moir
Stu Moir
3 years ago

I can’t say I’m upset at seeing the big 3 throwing a hissy fit about having to acquiesce to a monopoly. Schadenfreude is real.

XboxSX
XboxSX
3 years ago

I blame nobody but the TTC. It’s 2023. Get with it and allow the carriers to install their own networks. Absolute joke of a transit system.

Stu Moir
Stu Moir
Reply to  XboxSX
3 years ago

That would mean they’d have to eat the BAI contract.

mvanpee
mvanpee
Reply to  XboxSX
3 years ago

This isn’t the TTC’s fault. Even after this contract expires, they will not allow 3 different sets of network equipment, nor should they.

Philip Louca
Philip Louca
3 years ago

I blame the Ford government not able to pass bill that will force ttc to have cell services

mvanpee
mvanpee
Reply to  Philip Louca
3 years ago

You can’t force them to do it. Who would pay for it? It’s just a ridiculous idea.

George
George
3 years ago

Why does the Montreal métro have full cellular coverage, but not Toronto?
https : // www .stm.info/en/about/major_projects/completed-major-projects/mobile-network

clee666
clee666
3 years ago

STM has cell coverage everywhere, can’t hide anymore 🙁

Park Jihyo
Park Jihyo
3 years ago

theres only 3 subway lines, just make everybody life better

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x