Feds Need to Notify Canadians their Cellphone Movements Being Tracked, Says Committee

CleanShot 2022 05 05 at 15 18 33 2x

The federal government has been quietly tracking location data of 33 million Canadian devices, a practice that started during the COVID-19 pandemic and hopes to continue through May 31, 2023.

The Canadian Press reports recommendations from a House of Commons committee say Canadians need to be informed by Ottawa if they are tracking Canadian location data from cellphones, plus allow them to opt-out of the practice.

The ethics committee started its investigation into the cellphone data tracking matter in January, after pushback from the public.

The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) tracking 33 million mobile devices to determine “population mobility patterns” during COVID-19 lockdowns. The agency wants to keep tracking location data until May 31, 2021.

According to the committee’s recommendations, the federal government needs to inform people about these tracking programs “in a manner that clearly outlines the nature and purpose of the data collection.”

The government also needs to look into changing privacy laws to allow more privacy protections, plus allow Canadians to opt-out of any tracking.

Consumer non-profit and advocate OpenMedia said the federal government only notified Canadians mobile tracking was happening by posting a notice on its website in March 2020. A website for the tracking program COVIDTrends didn’t launch until 7 months later, while information on the use of the tracked data didn’t appear on the site until December 2020.

Also, the government’s COVIDTrends website did not disclose Telus and BlueDot were the sources of tracking mobile data. “If you look it up on Google, you can see how the data was used,” said Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos during his ethics committee testimony.

BlueDot created reports for the federal government with anonymized data and provided it to the PHAC, to better understand Canadian travel patterns during COVID-19, recording trips such as going to the liquor store or pharmacy.

Telus Chief Data and Trust Officer, Pamela Snively, told the committee during her testimony, “we did not obtain user consent for this specific purpose,” referring to seeking user permission to share their de-identified location data.

In Bell’s brief, the company said it did not provide mobile location data to the federal government.

“As you are aware, Bell did not provide mobile movement data to the Public Health Agency of Canada during the pandemic and we are not familiar with the details of that initiative. However, there should be no doubt that the appropriate use of de-identified data can serve the public interest in protecting public health and allow policymakers to obtain critical insights to support more informed public policy, while fully protecting the privacy interests of Canadians,” said the telecom.

“PHAC’s use of our mobility data is pointing to a disturbing reality; the federal government has effectively rendered our limited privacy rights negligible by discounting the foundational principle of consent, without introducing an adequate replacement set of principles,” said OpenMedia.

Previously, PHAC said any location data collected from cellphone towers would have personal identifiers removed, while adding it has also received advice from the privacy commissioner along with other privacy and ethics professionals.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
It's Me
It's Me
3 years ago

Not at all unexpected that the Trudeau government was spying on Canadians and kept it under wraps.

The funny part is that they didn’t really need to put Canadians under surveillance or even to ask/hire telcos and bluedot to do it for them. They could have simply used the surveillance data from google, which has been publishing such population movements data since early 2020 for multiple countries and regions.

https://www.google .com/covid19/mobility/

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  It's Me
3 years ago

If you think this has anything to do with the gov, you are mistaken, it is a practiced done by CSIS

It's Me
It's Me
Reply to  Dany Quirion
3 years ago

CSIS isn’t a government agency?

If it’s CSIS, under orders from the Trudeau government, that’s worse.

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  It's Me
3 years ago

It doesnt matter who is the PM, the agency has been doing that for the last 2 decades. You are giving way too much power to the government.

db
db
3 years ago

LOL and I took a cyber-beating on these boards awhile back when I stated I wasn’t downloading the app due to privacy issues…

raslucas
raslucas
Reply to  db
3 years ago

What app? They were tracking cellphones.

And I don’t get why this is news, they were very open about this through the pandemic. Openly publishing the data.

db
db
Reply to  raslucas
3 years ago

I was under the impression this article was in regards to the “COVID Alert” app that the gov put out.

As far as the data is concerned, it is the property of the people to consent to, not to be taken from.

raslucas
raslucas
Reply to  db
3 years ago

No, it’s Telus’s cell carrier data and so it’s only the triangulation of user’s phone’s data connections to their cell towers.

I’m all for discussing whether that data that should be allowed to be tracked (or publicized, it’s obviously tracked by the carriers or how would they improve their services), however anonymous and generalized it is… but let’s stick to facts here.

This isn’t news, this data has been open and accessible for well over a year.

It's Me
It's Me
Reply to  raslucas
3 years ago

He might have been thinking of the ArriveCAN app. Although the government continually denied that it was tracking locations, there were early reports from truckers that said, in effect, “I arrived at the border at the guard told me to drive through because they’d been notified of my status and arrival”.

After constant denials, a UK company flagged the Android version of the app as using “fine location” permissions. Subsequently, the app was updated to remove this surveillance permission but the gov never acknowledged it.

timberwolf
timberwolf
Reply to  raslucas
3 years ago

Finally someone talking sense. Thank you.

johnnygoodface
johnnygoodface
3 years ago

Until 2021 or 2023?

11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x