The European Commission has initiated two proceedings to help Apple meet its obligations under the Digital Markets Act (DMA). Under the DMA, Apple must provide third-party developers and businesses free and effective interoperability with hardware and software features controlled by iOS and iPadOS.
The first proceeding focuses on iOS connectivity features, essential for devices like smartwatches, headphones, and VR headsets to work seamlessly with iPhones. The second proceeding addresses how Apple handles interoperability requests from developers and third parties, ensuring the process is transparent and fair.
The Commission will finalize these proceedings within six months and outline the measures Apple needs to take to comply. The Commission will also publish a summary of its findings to gather feedback from third parties.
“Today is the first time we use specification proceedings under the DMA to guide Apple towards effective compliance with its interoperability obligations through constructive dialogue. We are focused on ensuring fair and open digital markets,” said Margrethe Vestager, Executive Vice-President in charge of competition policy.
“Effective interoperability, for example with smartphones and their operating systems, plays an important role in this. This process will provide clarity for developers, third parties and Apple. We will continue our dialogue with Apple and consult third parties to ensure that the proposed measures work in practice and meet the needs of businesses,” added Vestager.
If Apple fails to comply, the EU could fine Apple up to 10% of global revenue. Now, Apple stands for privacy and security, so opening up iOS and iPadOS might compromise the user experience. Things are looking messy for Apple in the EU right now. Apple Intelligence may never debut in the EU.
These proceedings aim to ensure Apple’s platforms remain fair and open to competition, as required by the DMA. Apple must fully comply with these regulations for iOS by March 2024 and iPadOS by October 2024.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
On one hand, a closed system like Apple’s has its advantages for sure, especially for security. But there has to be a balance if they open it up and that is the challenge.
iPhone's Home app already supports Matter, the smarthome connectivity standard. What else does Ms. Vestiger want? Apple to port their iWork apps for Android watches?
More than SmartHome. Every single thing that can connected to an iPhone. Starting with “smartwatches, headphones, and VR headsets”.
Over regulation is why there are almost no technology leaders in Europe.
And also the EU is why one has to pay extra for Microsoft Teams – additional invoices to manage, etc. All because of a nonsense complaint and the EU. I would prefer to have a secure system.
Apple should tell the EU their accessory manufacturers can purchase all the W1 pairing chips from Apple that they want if they require their accessories to pair with iPhones as easily as Beats and AirPods devices.
Then make sure the W1 chips are manufactured in U.S. to rub it in after Ms. Vesteger leaves the EC in December. Ha!
EU would still complain. They’d probably force Apple to allow others to manufacture and sell those chips to other vendors and call it competition.
The EU is where innovation goes to die.
EU can complain but TSMC still makes vast majority of chips thanks to their economies of scale advantage over competitors. Apple can tell TSMC they must make it in US and they have no choice but to obey. EU would find it difficult to manufacture them elsewhere cheaper
The bigger Q is whether accessory makers will even want to spend the extra money to make it a bit easier to pair with iPhones? I doubt they will want the added expense.
Apple user base are used to paying a premium for Apple first party devices as they have the reputation for it. However, will people pay a premium for third party "clone" accessories? The cost of even a cloned W1 chip may not make sense for this category of accessories? It may actually result in lower sales for their products? iPhone users may be thinking, why don't I just a buy AirPods or Apple Watch if I'm not going to save much?
None of the devices mentioned work over Matter protocol
If they can start by making sure that my iPhone 15 doesn’t loose connection to chromecast every 5 minutes, that would be great. Only fix is to turn off wifi and turn it back on.