Apple Ordered to Pay $502 Million to Optis Over 4G Patents
The UK Court of Appeal has ruled that Apple must pay $502 million to Optis Cellular Technology LLC for the unauthorized use of standard-essential 4G patents in its iPhones and iPads, Reuters is reporting.

The legal confrontation began in 2019 when Texas-based Optis sued Apple in London, alleging that the tech giant had utilized its essential 4G patents without proper licensing agreements. These patents are deemed critical for 4G connectivity, making them indispensable for modern smartphones and tablets.
In 2023, the UK’s High Court initially ordered Apple to pay $56.43 million plus interest to Optis, covering both past and future sales over a specified period. However, Optis contested this amount, arguing that it undervalued the significance of their patents. The Court of Appeal has now sided with Optis, mandating a lump sum payment of $502 million for the period spanning 2013 to 2027.
Optis has welcomed the ruling, stating that it “corrected a clearly flawed prior ruling and has made meaningful progress toward affirming the true value of our patents to Apple devices.” The company emphasized its commitment to ensuring fair compensation for its intellectual property that enables high-speed connectivity for millions of devices worldwide.
Conversely, Apple expressed disappointment with the decision and plans to appeal. A spokesperson for Apple criticized Optis, stating, “Optis makes no products and their sole business is to sue companies using patents they buy. We will continue to defend against their attempts.”
Should Apple fail to comply with the court’s decision, it may face an injunction in the UK market, potentially halting the sale of its popular devices. This scenario underscores the critical nature of adhering to FRAND obligations and the legal ramifications of non-compliance.

The outcome of this case could have far-reaching implications for the tech industry, particularly concerning how companies negotiate and honor licensing agreements for essential technologies.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
This should be under US jurisdiction, not British. They are two American companies.