British Columbia’s Attorney General Says Distracted Driving Could Soon Cost You Your Keys

According to a new report from Global News, British Columbia’s attorney general hinted that distracted driving could soon cost drivers their privileges behind the wheel.

On Friday attorney general David Eby was asked whether the province would consider implementing immediate roadside prohibitions for distracted drivers. Eby said:

“Absolutely.

We’re escalating the penalties and consequences of distracted driving to try and to try to get the message through to this hardcore group that just will not put their phones down. Because the same thing happened with seatbelts, and with drinking and driving, and whatever it’s going to take to get there.”

Solicitor General Mike Farnworth said that the current penalties that exist don’t seem to be deterring distracted drivers. Farnworth did not mention anything about the potential for roadside prohibitions for distracted drivers.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mamba
Mamba
8 years ago

Does anyone have, or know, links showing stats of distracted driving in BC? And can anyone please elaborate what would be considered/count as distracted driving? Would talking to a passenger violate this legislation?

Jason Chu
Jason Chu
Reply to  Mamba
8 years ago

I’m one to agree to this post. What about changing radio station or grabbing a sip from a drink? I think that distracted driving should have a subcategory of just electronic device distraction.

I can grab a sip of my drink while waiting for a light to change but I can’t look at my phone for a text message.

My 1/2 cents
My 1/2 cents
Reply to  Jason Chu
8 years ago

Nah. That would violate one’s human rights. Lol. Accusing someone of cell phone distracted driving is much easier than doing so for other types of distracted driving. In the end, it’s not about public safety. Rather a quick cash grab.

My 1/2 cents
My 1/2 cents
Reply to  Mamba
8 years ago

The insurance corporation of bc was caught exaggerating distracted cell phone driving stats. It’s about as accurate as the amount of foreign home ownership in bc.

Sam
Sam
Reply to  Mamba
8 years ago

Do an internet search for: bc distracted driving stats

Got Game? Get Game! ???
Got Game? Get Game! ???
8 years ago

Whinny kids in the backseat would put anyone on in the ditch and apparently behind bars!

My 1/2 cents
My 1/2 cents
8 years ago

Yet no such consequence and lack of enforcement for aggressive and dangerous driving. This anti-phone use is nothing short of a big joke and an easy money grab for the government.

Sam
Sam
8 years ago

The sooner the less likely of someone dying when it is not their turn.

Tom Gray
8 years ago

I just want the airbag to be replaced with a air powered boxing glove.
Whether you’re distracted or not, it detects if you cut off a pedestrian at a crosswalk or other drivers, it fires out and punches you right in the face.

Can’t be mad, as your own actions trigger it lol. Safety, and it’ll provide smiles for all those watching lol.

9
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x