Call for Public Inquiry into Telecom Sales Practices Denied by CRTC

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) has rejected a call to hold public inquiry into recent media reports of misleading sales practices by some of country’s major wireless carriers. According to CBC News, Ottawa based non-profit agency, The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), is now protesting the CRTC’s refusal.

John

PIAC had requested the CRTC last month to launch a public inquiry following multiple reports by CBC News’ Go Public about high-pressure sales tactics by telecom employees when selling TV, internet or wireless services. According to the telecom regulator however, there is no need for a public inquiry as consumers already have access to a variety of telecom complaint options. 

“CRTC throws consumers to telco sales dogs,” PIAC’s executive director, John Lawford, said in a statement.

“The CRTC refusal to inquire into the shocking sales practices of Canada’s major telecommunications and broadcasting companies says to consumers, ‘You’re on your own.'”

Lawford said that a problem with this approach is that the CCTS is set up to take on individual complaints, not investigate systemic problems. “Only the CRTC has the regulatory authority to ask the industry to change practices,” he said.

Meanwhile, the Competition Bureau didn’t comment on Lawford’s claims, but said it takes all complaints about misleading marketing practices seriously.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Chrome262
Chrome262
8 years ago

once again the CRTC proves it has not teeth. Some one asked me once, “doesn’t Canada have anti trust laws?” I said yes in theory, just no enforcement

mcfilmmakers
mcfilmmakers
Reply to  Chrome262
8 years ago

No. Proving they don’t have teeth is rendering a decision against thebtelcos but not actually punishing them. This is the CRTC proving they always cover their ears saying “I cant hear you”.

Aleks Oniszczak
Aleks Oniszczak
8 years ago

CRTC = Canadian Riches To Corporations

johnnygoodface
johnnygoodface
8 years ago

I’m curious to know CRTC’s reasons for not doing so…

mark peterson
mark peterson
8 years ago

CRTC USELESS BUNCH OF TROGGS

5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x