Low-Cost iPhone Won’t Be Cheap, Says Pegatron CEO

low-cost-iphone

The rumoured low-cost iPhone won’t be that cheap after all, Pegratron CEO T.H. Tung said during a general shareholder meeting (via Macotakara), reports the China Times. His words apparently confirm earlier analyst estimates that the budget iPhone will target the middle-end market rather than the low-end.

The company recently made headlines when it was rumoured to have won a contract from Apple to assemble the long-rumoured budget iPhone. Tung, however, emphasized that what is often described as “cheap” still can be a high price.

Also, he pointed to Apple’s currently available products and said that cheap isn’t a word that could be used to describe Apple or its less expensive iPhone.

His words apparently confirm that his company is indeed handling at least a portion of the anticipated iPhone. Pegatron was adding another 40,000 workers to its existing workforce about a month ago. This suggests the company won the assembly contract for the low-cost iPhone.

According to the China Times’ sources, the budget iPhone is already in production and an estimated 13-15 million handsets will ship in the third quarter of 2013.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
homeward
homeward
12 years ago

Of course it won’t be cheap, it’s Apple we’re talking about here.

wiz
wiz
Reply to  homeward
12 years ago

The combined cost of the components for the iPhone 5 is estimated at $197, or only $9 more than for the iPhone 4S. Is that not a cheap phone already? $197ish to make and sell for 800+ can we all say suckers. iphone 4 is three years old now and free with three year contract. Is that not a cheap phone? One day people will figure it out.

WatDah
WatDah
12 years ago

Should be called Lower-Cost iPhone.

K3
K3
12 years ago

….so then the question would be then- why bother making two separate phones this year?

4
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x