The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., has partly reversed the $930 million ruling Apple won against Samsung in the patent infringement lawsuit closely watched by the tech world, reports Reuters.
You may recall that Apple scored a major victory against Samsung in a San Jose court when a number of Samsung’s smartphones were found to be violating Apple’s patents. While the original verdict was more than $1 billion, it was later revised to $930 million.
Samsung appealed against this revised ruling, and today was on the winning side: While some of the patent infringement claims are valid, the appeals court ordered the San Jose court to rethink the $382 million part awarded for what’s called in legal terms trade dress dilution.
Trade dress essentially describes the way a product is presented – in Apple’s case, the design of the iPhone. The appeals court says the design features “Apple sought to trademark” are not eligible, because it would grant the company a “monopoly on these features forever”, and, by the way, are not essential to the functioning of the device.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
