The war between Toronto’s taxi industry and Uber is raging on after last week’s Licensing and Standards Committee meeting. City Councillors voted 5 to 1 late Friday night on a bunch of taxi-related changes, yet got rid of many that would help legalize UberX on Toronto streets.
About 100 people spoke at the two-day-long marathon of a meeting. While Uber Canada didn’t show up, the company sent in a response to the proposed new by-laws on Friday prior to the vote. Uber Canada questioned many of the new rules, as the Globe writes, including those in relation to the age of its drivers’ vehicles as well as the city’s proposed driver-related fees.
In a blog post today, Uber reiterated the downfalls of Toronto losing ride-sharing services:
– Hundreds of thousands of Torontonians that rely on ridesharing each and every day will lose a safe, reliable option to get home.
– Over fifteen thousand driver partners will lose the ability to make income on their own schedule.
– Toronto would become the largest city in North America to not have ridesharing.
– The accessibility community and older adults will be denied access to a reliable and affordable transportation option with uberWAV and uberASSIST.
– Hundreds of restaurants that have been surviving and thriving with UberEATS will lose a means to keep growing their small businesses.
– Torontonians would lose the option to share their rides with uberPOOL that helps reduce congestion in our city.
If you live in Toronto and you want to make sure ride-sharing services stay in the city, please contact your city councillor and share your story about what Uber means to you.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
The taxi mafia wins -_-
And canadian progress is once again halted… now let us all go back to paying hundreds for a wireless service that costs next to nothing in the states
That’s a rich blog post coming from a company that knowingly operates illegally and insists on operating illegally until it can convince legislators to make its operations legal.