Bell Exec Urged ‘Positive’ Spin on News After Firing of LaFlamme
In the wake of the high-profile firing of CTV anchor Lisa LaFlamme last year, Bell Media President, Wade Oosterman urged news managers to adopt a more “balanced perspective” in news coverage about the parent company.
The Bell executive suggested a “positive spin” on stories involving parent company BCE, according to an audio recording of a meeting held on August 24, 2022, reports The Globe and Mail. The move calls into question the journalistic independence of Bell news outlets.
Oosterman, who also serves as the vice-chair of BCE, expressed a determination to bring more balance to CTV news programming to attract a larger audience and avoid potential budget cuts due to dwindling viewership.
Without specifying the missing perspective from CTV news coverage, two anonymous former news managers cited Oosterman’s criticism of LaFlamme’s newscast as being overly supportive of the federal Liberals.
In the same meeting, Oosterman advised CTV journalists to adopt a supportive approach when reporting on Bell, the telecom giant, albeit not at the cost of distorting reality. He suggested favouring a positive spin, especially when it comes to reporting on BCE’s financial performance.
While emphasizing BCE’s value as a “jewel”, Oosterman expressed confusion as to why the company’s accomplishments were not being embraced more enthusiastically.
However, these comments seem to contradict BCE’s journalistic independence policy. This policy was established to reinforce the principles of news independence and non-interference between BCE and CTV News, emphasizing the necessity of maintaining viewer and listener trust.
In response, Tammy Scott, Senior Vice-President of Communications at BCE, clarified that while BCE executives can propose news coverage ideas, the final decisions on coverage are made by editors, adhering to standards of accuracy, fairness, completeness, honesty, transparency, and independence.
Oosterman addressed the meeting, attended by over a dozen news managers, to discuss LaFlamme’s departure and emphasized that her dismissal was not a result of discriminatory practices based on her hair colour or age.
He also warned that CTV was losing audiences to on-demand and digital-streaming services at an alarming rate. The network must deliver compelling content or prepare for substantial cost cuts, said Oosterman.
This follows Bell Media’s recent announcement of cutting 1,300 positions, around 3% of its workforce, and closing or selling nine radio stations, in response to what it claims is unfavourable public policy and regulatory conditions.
LaFlamme, a news veteran of 35 years, said at the time Bell Media called her contract dismissal a “business decision”. She said she was “blindsided” by Bell Media and was “shocked and saddened” at the time. Rogers later hired LaFlamme to cover the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II as a special correspondent for CityNews.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Perhaps if they didn’t cut respected journalists, close foreign news bureaus and local radio stations and strove to be more that a simulcast network for US programming across all of their networks, people would find a rationale for being attracted to their product.
Oosterman expressed confusion as to why the company’s accomplishments were not being embraced more enthusiastically.
——
Probably because most Canadians are so used to getting a good shellacking from Bell for so long, anything this company does is viewed in a negative light.
I hope this company rots away to nothing taking their management down with them.
“journalistic independence”, LOL! Who can be so naive to believe that those who own the outfit are not the ones who control the narrative?
we can only hope that Bell implodes. They cut 1300 people from their payroll and none of them from quebec. very questionable indeed.