48% of Canadians Want Feds to ‘Back Down’ vs Meta and Google

angus reid bill c18

The tension between the Canadian government and major tech companies over the Online News Act, also known as Bill C-18, is amplifying amidst rising temperatures this summer. The Act aims to compel tech giants such as Meta and Alphabet to invest millions into accessing and disseminating Canadian content.

A new study conducted by the non-profit Angus Reid Institute reveals that while Canadians overwhelmingly agree that big tech companies should compensate local organizations for their content, a significant portion is concerned about potential repercussions. Notably, over 60% of Canadians fear they might lose access to Canadian news on platforms like Facebook and Google.

The Angus Reid survey indicates that 61% of Canadians believe these tech giants should pay Canadian entities when their content is shared on their platforms, given the considerable advertising revenues that these platforms garner. However, the prospect of losing access to Canadian news on popular platforms like Facebook and Google is a concern for 63% of respondents.

The fear of losing these platforms as news sources has led to 48% of Canadians urging the federal government to back off from its conflict with Meta and Google. On the other hand, 26% insist that the government should stand its ground, and another 25% are unsure about the best course of action.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has stated the government won’t “back down” against tech giants like Meta.

The potential loss of news from Facebook and Google would significantly impact Canadians, as over 40% rely on these platforms daily for news. This surpasses the usage rate for all other platforms and websites.

Other key findings from the survey include the fact that national Canadian news sites (32%), Facebook (28%), and Google News (23%) are the top go-to sources for Canadian news content.

Only around 15% of Canadians currently subscribe to a Canadian online news site. The Online News Act is more likely to be opposed by past Conservative voters (75%), while only about a third of past Liberal (32%) and NDP (34%) voters would want to reverse it.

Federal Government Seemingly Now Changing Core of Online News Act

Today Canadian Heritage outlined the next steps for the Online News Act, which seemingly suggests the government is changing the core of the Act somewhat.

That’s according to a breakdown of the complex language by University of Ottawa Professor, Michael Geist.

He says the federal government is preparing to set up regulations that will establish the minimum financial contribution from each tech giant, such as Google and Meta, in relation to their revenue derived from Canada. This sum can be met by combining both their existing deals and non-financial contributions like training programs or free advertising.

This approach appears to align with Google’s structural stipulations since it does not tie payments to hyperlinks, limits liability, and considers other forms of contributions. In practice, each company would tally up their current deals, negotiate new agreements with broadcasters and other independent outlets, and then seek exemption approval from the CRTC.

“This quagmire is entirely the government’s own making,” writes Geist. “There were alternative options proposed that look much like this structure. Those were consistently rejected and those proposing the alternatives dismissed as shills.”

“Yet faced with emerging disaster that is Bill C-18, the government seems prepared to ditch the principles it said were critical in its news bill in the hope of a face-saving compromise,” explains Geist. “Whether it is also willing to drop the visions of hundreds of millions for the sector will likely determine whether it can convince at least one of the platforms to drop their plans to block news links or news sharing in Canada,” he concluded.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Spittt
Spittt
2 years ago

How difficult can it be for Canadians to go to sites like reuters for Canadian news instead of Facebook or Google?

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  Spittt
2 years ago

reuters are you kidding? Its filled up with right wings bigots.

Spittt
Spittt
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

I think reuters is pretty good. However, you can always compare content with other sources as per your discretion. I am sure you would do that with other sources including Google and Facebook “news” anyway

Ipse
Ipse
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

Call them Na.zis and fas.cists while you’re at it…no other opinions shall be allowed by the Ministry of Truth in Kanukistan. Well done Orwell, the political discourse is really thriving.

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  Ipse
2 years ago

Opinion on different type of politics, but politics based on hate or from religious influence definitely shouldn’t be allowed no.

MleB1
MleB1
2 years ago

Google and Meta using their multi-billion dollar megaphones to amplify their position (The Sky Is Falling, The Sky Is Falling!), largely to people who use their products to get shortcuts to news sites, without explaining that these corporations don’t pay these providers of news. Promoting digital shoplifting, while telling Canadians their theft is good – it brings more people into the store.

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
2 years ago

Most Canadians dont understand the implications of “backing down”

7
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x