Beeper Mini Returns, Allowing Android to iMessage an iPhone Again

Beeper mini hero app

Beeper Mini, which lets Android users chat with Apple’s iMessage on iPhone, is back with an updated version after facing technical issues.

The app, which had a successful launch, reaching the top 20 of the Play Store charts, encountered problems on Friday, leading to a temporary inability for users to send or receive messages.

Canadian Eric Migicovsky and Brad Murray, Beeper cofounders, announced the release of the updated version on their website today and on Google Play. The update includes new features like chats opening at the last unread message and an improved video player. Notably, Beeper Mini remains free to use amid the ongoing situation with Apple, which put a stop to the app shortly after its launch. The app costs $1.99 USD per month after a 7 day free trial.

Migicovsky commented on the situation, “Beeper Mini made communication between Android and iPhone users more secure. That is a fact. The changes Apple made were designed to protect the lock-in effect of iMessage, resulting in less security and privacy for iPhone customers.”

This time around, you need to log in to Beeper with your Apple ID and linking your phone number no longer works.

Apple, in a statement to The Verge on the weekend, defended its actions, citing privacy and security concerns. “We took steps to protect our users by blocking techniques that exploit fake credentials to access iMessage. These techniques posed significant risks, including potential metadata exposure and enabling unwanted messages,” the statement read.

“Beeper Mini made communication between Android and iPhone users more secure. That is a fact,” said the Beeper Mini co-founders, defending their app, noting it is end-to-end encrypted while also being open source. The app leverages Apple’s own push notification protocol to work.

The Beeper team has expressed willingness to share their codebase with a third-party security research firm to prove their commitment to security and privacy. They also suggested adding a pager emoji to metadata on messages sent via Beeper Mini, to allow Apple’s Messages App to filter them out.

Despite the challenges, Migicovsky and Murray remain committed to their mission. “At the end of the day, we are committed to building the best chat app on earth. We will continue working on that,” they affirmed.

Grab your popcorn, folks. It’s clear Apple doesn’t want Beeper Mini to exist right now. The game of cat and mouse continues…

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
It's Me
It's Me
2 years ago

“At the end of the day, we are committed to building the best chat app on earth.”

…by simply inserting ourselves into an existing chat app…

If they really want to do that, on their own, why not write an RCS app for iPhone? That way, anyone iPhone user that wants to chat with insecure Android users can use that.

So Young
So Young
Reply to  It's Me
2 years ago

Good point! Completely agree.

Jason H
Jason H
Reply to  It's Me
2 years ago

In all your apple spewing nonsense you fail to mention that someone under the age of 18 was able to exployte Apple’s iMessage service. Personally I’m more concerned that someone is even able to take advantage of this service with anything external on other devices to begin with and will probably use iMessage less as a consequence. Unless it had an API to do exactly this from the outset and the app is just taking advantage of it. If this was the case why hasn’t it been tried on Android years ago?

Instead, you’re more salty that users on another platform dare to use your super cool messaging service, lol. Really speaks volumes about certain apple users and their attitudes.

It's Me
It's Me
Reply to  Jason H
2 years ago

Careful, your insecurities are showing.

Jason H
Jason H
Reply to  It's Me
2 years ago

So no answers to the above questions, since there are none yet.
Thanks.

It's Me
It's Me
Reply to  Jason H
2 years ago

My apologies, I didn’t really think it was a serious question. I thought it was just a strange way of showing off that you don’t understand what an API is.

To answer, yes, of course there’s an API to use the Messages network. It would be a mostly undocumented, private API, but any API can be reserve engineered.

Why hasn’t anyone else done it? Mainly because if it is an undocumented, private API, Apple frowns on using private, undocumented APIs and it’s a good way to have the ban hammer dropped. Why would someone waste time, when they could write their own chat app instead of being chased away by Apple?

So Young
So Young
Reply to  Jason H
2 years ago

What you should think is why so many Android users want to use iMessage at a point they’re willing to pay for it and they exposed themselves for potential security concerns.

So Young
So Young
2 years ago

Its also a fact that if Android users wants iMessage so bad and they’re willing to pay $2/month to access it, just buy a freakin’ iPhone. It just mean your Android phone isn’t made for you because you could just use other messaging apps like Telegram, Messenger etc at this point.

Jason H
Jason H
Reply to  So Young
2 years ago

So spend $24 a year or $1000, makes a lot of sense lol.
But yes, I agree. many more free options. I’m sure this is mainly to appease teens and nobody else.

Jason H
Jason H
2 years ago

App gets around Apple’s so called secure messaging service. By a minor, twice.
Comments: How dare they use a so called less secure operating system to take advantage of our super safe secure protected messages that are sent to Apple servers!

LMAO

It's Me
It's Me
Reply to  Jason H
2 years ago

Careful, your ignorance is showing.

Also, Eric Migicovsky is like 40. Not a minor. Not a teen. You’re obsessing about teens.

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x