Bill S-210: A Threat to Internet Freedom and Privacy, Warns Expert

The Canadian internet landscape faces a potential upheaval with Bill S-210, known as the Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act, moving closer to becoming law.

Dr. Michael Geist, law professor at the University of Ottawa and Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-commerce Law, has voiced serious concerns about the bill’s implications for internet censorship and privacy.

Passed by the Senate in April and recently voted through the second reading in the House of Commons, Bill S-210 has been championed by Senator Julie Miville-Duchêne and supported by various political parties, despite opposition from government ministers. The bill aims to curb underage access to sexually explicit material online but has raised significant concerns due to its broad scope and enforcement mechanisms.

Geist, who appeared before the Senate committee studying the bill, stated, “By bringing together website blocking, face recognition technologies, and stunning overbreadth that would capture numerous mainstream services, the bill isn’t just a slippery slope, it is an avalanche.” He acknowledged the importance of protecting minors from inappropriate content but emphasized that the bill extends beyond personal choices and envisions government-enforced global website liability.

The bill proposes fines of up to $500,000 for organizations that fail to prevent underage access to explicit material and requires them to implement prescribed age-verification methods, which might include face recognition technologies.

Geist expressed concerns about these privacy-invasive measures, stating, “This effectively means that sites will require their users to register with commercial age verification systems in order to run a search or access some tweets. And the age verification systems raise real privacy concerns, including mandated face recognition as part of the verification process.”

Moreover, the enforcement of Bill S-210, likely to be overseen by the CRTC, involves potential website blocking by ISPs, extending to websites globally. Geist highlighted the risks of overblocking, explaining that the bill “not only envisions the possibility of blocking lawful content or limiting access to those over 18, it expressly permits it.”

He pointed out any site that has sexually explicit content, including search engines, social media networks such as X (formerly Twitter), and online forums including Reddit, could be blocked.

Despite the bill’s progression, Geist remains critical of its potential impact on internet freedom in Canada. “The bill should not have come this far and should not be supported,” he asserted, pointing out the dangers of government-backed censorship and the erosion of digital privacy rights.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jamie G
Jamie G
2 years ago

Justin Castro back at it.

Canada is looking more like North Korea than Canada after almost a decade of this idiot.

DK
DK
Reply to  Jamie G
2 years ago

Imagine one man so powerful, so scary, so dictator-like he can even stop you from reading article linked in the tweet. Slow the fear-mongering.

“ The bill, which is the brainchild of Senator Julie Miville-Duchêne, is not a government bill. In fact, government ministers voted against it. Instead, the bill is backed by the Conservatives, Bloc and NDP with a smattering of votes from backbench Liberal MPs. Canadians can be forgiven for being confused that after months of championing Internet freedoms, raising fears of censorship, and expressing concern about CRTC overregulation of the Internet, Conservative MPs were quick to call out those who opposed the bill (the House sponsor is Conservative MP)”

Jamie G
Jamie G
Reply to  DK
2 years ago

Very surprised, I thought after the news bill(C51?), the liberals would be in support of this

Patrick Bouchard
Patrick Bouchard
Reply to  Jamie G
2 years ago

Did you miss the part where it’s the other parties supporting this and the Liberals are against it?

Jamie G
Jamie G
Reply to  Patrick Bouchard
2 years ago

Yeah I absolutely did miss that, I apologize.

One way or another this entire government has been a letdown. Between this and bill c51 and the OIC I’m speechless

timberwolf
timberwolf
Reply to  Patrick Bouchard
2 years ago

With the disaster the current government is, though, when conservatives inevitably get the majority we’ll be in for a wild ride if this is anything to go by.

Commentz123
Commentz123
Reply to  Patrick Bouchard
2 years ago

wow is this topsy turvy day??

Commentz123
Commentz123
2 years ago

draconian times my friends, not peaceful times.

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x