Bell Document Reportedly Tells Staff Not to Promote New $25 Basic TV
Bell does not want its employees to promote their new CRTC-mandated $25 ‘skinny’ TV basic package, claim internal documents obtained by CBC News.

An anonymous Bell employee told the public broadcaster “They’re making the skinny basic package simply unbuyable,” adding “What’s been explained to me is that maybe one per cent of people would be interested in getting it.”
The text in the internal training document states “Do not promote the Starter TV package. There will be no advertising, and this package should only be discussed if the customer initiates the conversation.”
Pricing for Fibe ‘Starter’ Internet and add-ons are also detailed in the document. An example plan lists ‘Starter’ high-speed Internet, plus two $7 pick-and-pay channels, and TV hardware rental, coming to $130.35, according to Bell’s calculations.
Bell spokeswoman Jacqueline Michelis said in an email to CBC News, “Sorry I wouldn’t comment on anonymous claims or documents you are finding,” adding “We wouldn’t pre-announce pricing,” and “It’s a competitive business,” while stating “We will follow all CRTC rules, we always do.”
Scott Hutton, the CRTC’s executive director of broadcasting, clarified broadcasters are obliged to advertise their new $25 ‘skinny’ TV packages, plus upcoming pick-and-pay channel options.
“[We] will certainly be following through on ensuring that they promote this package and these opportunities as well as they promote their other packages.”
Yesterday we learned of Rogers’ $24.99 ‘skinny’ TV package plus add-ons, which were released prematurely by the company after they were similarly leaked to CBC News. Bell’s own $24.95 ‘skinny’ TV bundle was leaked by an ‘anonymous’ employee on Reddit.
All cable and satellite TV companies are obliged to release basic TV packages priced at no more than $25, plus pick-and-pay channel options, starting March 1, 2016, as mandated by the CRTC.
Want to see more of our stories on Google?
P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!
Made a comment about this on your previous post about Bell’s “Skinny package” being leaked accidentally on purpose & how the employees are being told not to promote it.
one more reason to hate bell 🙂
Bell is by far the most evil on the big 3, although Rogers has been doing their best/worst to compete with them as of late.
Sounds like something Bell would do.
Remember when the CRTC forced them to take away 3-year contracts? They complied in a completely unreasonable way, more than doubling the price of the monthly plans while simultaneously greatly reducing subsidies.
Sounds like they’re taking the same approach again.