Apple’s Lightning to 3.5mm Adapter Affects Sound Quality, Reveal Tests

Earlier today, Apple’s Lightning to 3.5mm adapter received the teardown treatment, which revealed that it includes a small digital-to-analog converter (DAC). Now, a German website, which has run extensive tests on the audio adapter to determine whether or not there is any sound degradation, has confirmed that the iPhone 7 with 3.5mm Lightning adapter does sound worse than iPhone 6s with 3.5mm headphone jack (via BGR).

tests

Below is a computer-generated translation quoted from the source:

The results are clear: with an iPhone 6S, the dynamic range worsens by 4.5 dB(A) for 24-bit music files. For the iPad Air, it worsens by 3.8 dB(A). The signal also gets worse for 16-bit music files, even if they aren’t that drastic: the dynamic range worsens by 1.8 dB(A) and 3.1 dB(A) for the iPhone and iPad, respectively.

However, it must be emphasized that these results aren’t too bad since the difference is going to be completely imperceptible to most people. In fact, even some audiophiles with an incredible ear for sound won’t notice the difference unless they’re listening to high-quality 24-bit audio files.

So if you mostly listen to Spotify or Apple Music on your iPhone, chances are you won’t even notice the difference.

Of course, this is just one set of tests, so don’t take them as a foregone conclusion. One unscientific test by AppleInsider claimed the new Lightning EarPods sound better than the 3.5mm headphone jack, so it’s hard to say if anything is conclusive at this point.

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LadeeDa
LadeeDa
9 years ago

No sheet Sherlock! It’s common sense.

Ryan
Reply to  LadeeDa
9 years ago

Why is it common sense that they would use a lower-quality DAC in the adapter than they did in the previous iPhone? I would have expected they would have used one of equal quality.

poopchute
poopchute
Reply to  Ryan
9 years ago

I would really like to hear his explanation of common sense as well.

Nick La Riviere
Nick La Riviere
9 years ago

Hah! I called it in a post earlier today!

Biggy604
Biggy604
9 years ago

I wonder if the belkin dual adapter DAC is better?

chickeee
chickeee
Reply to  Biggy604
9 years ago

for $40 USD it should be

definingsound
definingsound
Reply to  chickeee
9 years ago

There is no DAC in the belkin “adapter”. It’s just a lightning port y-cable. Takes 1 lightning port and turns it into 2 lightning ports so that the Apple headphones can connect to the phone simultaneous to the usb cord.

poopchute
poopchute
9 years ago

Hahahahaha, the difference in dynamic range is so small it could easily be attributed to test samples. Also, no one will ever hear a difference when the numbers are above 90db anyway.
Those hipsters and their record players don’t get more than about 30db of dynamic range.
I guess what matters is that the German website who did the test gets its traffic.

Heisenberg
Heisenberg
Reply to  poopchute
9 years ago

I beg to differ. I heard the reduction in sound quality as soon as I plugged my Sennheiser Momentum 2 heardphones in – bass loses impact, does not reach down as deep, and music lost a lot of it’s dynamic drive in comparison to my prior Iphone 6 plus. It was quite apparent and easy to hear if you have quality headphones.

poopchute
poopchute
Reply to  Heisenberg
9 years ago

I believe you. Not all DAC’s are created the same.And I’m not arguing that they don’t sound different. I haven’t even tested for any difference myself yet.
I’m just laughing at the way our society is so quick to jump on silly pointless specs to prove a pre-existing bias.
Oh well.

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x