CBC, Radio-Canada to Cut Jobs Amid $125 Million Budget Shortfall

Cbc radio canada svg

CBC/Radio-Canada has revealed significant job and program cuts in the upcoming year are on the way.

This move comes as a response to an anticipated $125 million budget shortfall for the 2024–2025 fiscal period, according to the public broadcaster on Monday. The organization it is facing challenges in the Canadian media landscape, including escalating production costs, dwindling television advertising revenues, and intense competition from global streaming services.

Additionally, CBC/Radio-Canada is bracing for a decrease in parliamentary funding, which includes the termination of a $21 million annual program integrity fund that has been in place since 2021 due to COVID-19.

The Corporation is set to axe roughly 600 positions, spanning both unionized and non-union staff. This figure includes around 200 currently vacant roles that will be permanently dissolved. The job cuts are expected to be evenly distributed between CBC and Radio-Canada, accounting for about 250 positions each. The remainder will be from the Technology & Infrastructure division and other corporate sectors. The implementation of these reductions will be staggered with some happening right away and others spread over 12 months.

Additionally, there will be a scaling down of both the English and French programming budgets for the ensuing fiscal year. This reduction, amounting to roughly $40 million, will primarily affect independent production commissions and program acquisitions. The consequence of these cuts will be evident in fewer television series renewals, a reduction in new series and episodes, and a decrease in digital original series.

Currently, the CBC offers streaming services such as CBC Gem and CBC News Network, with a premium subscription offering available.

Earlier this year, CBC/Radio-Canada saw over $25 million in discretionary cost savings, which included cutting travel expenses, sponsorships, marketing activities, and delaying certain tech projects. The Corporation also restrained from filling vacant positions.

“CBC/Radio-Canada is not immune to the upheaval facing the Canadian media industry. We’ve successfully managed serious structural declines in our business for many years, but we no longer have the flexibility to do so without reductions. We understand how concerning this is to the people affected and to the Canadians who depend on our programs and services. We will have more details in the months ahead, but we are doing everything we can to minimize the impact of these measures,” said Catherine Tait, President and CEO of CBC/Radio-Canada, in a statement.

The CBC has received $1.27 billion in government funding in its fiscal 2023, up from $1.24 billion in 2022.

Earlier this year, the CBC protested and left Twitter (prior to being renamed X), due to the latter labelling the organization as “government-funded media.” But after a month, the CBC came back to Twitter, resuming its sharing activity (not before it was mocked by X owner Elon Musk).

Want to see more of our stories on Google?

Add iPhone in Canada as a Preferred Source on Google

P.S. Want to keep this site truly independent? Support us by buying us a beer, treating us to a coffee, or shopping through Amazon here. Links in this post are affiliate links, so we earn a tiny commission at no charge to you. Thanks for supporting independent Canadian media!

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jason
Jason
2 years ago

But yet Bonuses are being handed out like condoms at a grad party. DEFUND THE CBC!

Do Do
Do Do
2 years ago

Get rid of it entirely

db
db
Reply to  Do Do
2 years ago
Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  Do Do
2 years ago

Get rid of our national news network? So much for democracy

Ipse
Ipse
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

“National”???? What is national about the focus on main cities alone?

Plus…it’s not “national” when it’s a mouthpiece of the government in power – note i didn’t say “Lieberal”.

It will take a lot more than a name to change CBC and the perception Canadians have about it…less than 4% audience is hardly “national”.

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  Ipse
2 years ago

Because it does not endorse Right policies? Lmao its just common sense. When Harper was in power CBC was never defending him! So its hardly controlled by the gov in power. Also 80% of the population of Canada live in cities kinda of normal to focus on that! This is exactly why smaller local medias need to stay alive and Meta finally paying its fair share.

Do Do
Do Do
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

Well I’m not “right” and I loathe Harper’s conservatives but I am a tax payer running out of money because of useless government waste, like the CBC, and you just made the argument for getting rid of the CBC by suggesting it’s biased in favor of the “left” by bringing up they never supported Harper. I could almost understand it if it were something like CP24 which actually has news all day and keeps the public up to date on current news, albeit from an always biased point of view but still, it far more useful than the CBC.

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  Do Do
2 years ago

You missed the whole point I mentioned! Nobody educated would ever support anything the Right does, thats not being biased in favour* of the left! Its just common sense. Also lets be real, you wouldnt have more money in your pocket! Conservative provincial gov made sure we cant afford anything.

Do Do
Do Do
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

No, you missed the whole point, the CBC is s a complete waste of tax payer money, full stop.

Do Do
Do Do
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

Maybe you can explain how getting rid of this national burden on tax payers is a threat to democracy? Try to do without using strawman arguments.

Dany Quirion
Dany Quirion
Reply to  Do Do
2 years ago

The only burden on tax payers that I see is the billions we still give big oil corporation, not the few millions CBC gets.

Do Do
Do Do
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

Wrong, they’re both a burden, you not being able to see that speaks to your bias. Any objective thinker would see they’re both a burden.

Do Do
Do Do
Reply to  Dany Quirion
2 years ago

So you couldn’t manage to explain it without a strawman argument, good work LOL

Corey Beazer
Corey Beazer
2 years ago

Would love to see them go more towards they way it was in the 80s/90s.
Sticking with Sports, local news and magazine format shows. Content like their podcasts (which are quite successful).
I am okay with tax dollars going towards CBC as long as its providing some good local content.

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x